NEW JN0-664 DUMPS FREE & RELIABLE JN0-664 EXAM BOOTCAMP

New JN0-664 Dumps Free & Reliable JN0-664 Exam Bootcamp

New JN0-664 Dumps Free & Reliable JN0-664 Exam Bootcamp

Blog Article

Tags: New JN0-664 Dumps Free, Reliable JN0-664 Exam Bootcamp, JN0-664 Reliable Braindumps Ppt, Test JN0-664 Practice, Test JN0-664 Prep

2025 Latest Actual4test JN0-664 PDF Dumps and JN0-664 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rNY_rS1qRnpSNN1nqOG2Un8ZjVsFb6t6

Our product backend port system is powerful, so it can be implemented even when a lot of people browse our website can still let users quickly choose the most suitable for his JN0-664 learning materials, and quickly completed payment. It can be that the process is not delayed, so users can start their happy choice journey in time. Once the user finds the learning material that best suits them, only one click to add the JN0-664 learning material to their shopping cart, and then go to the payment page to complete the payment, our staff will quickly process user orders online. In general, users can only wait about 5-10 minutes to receive our JN0-664 learning material, and if there are any problems with the reception, users may contact our staff at any time. To sum up, our delivery efficiency is extremely high and time is precious, so once you receive our email, start your new learning journey.

Juniper JN0-664 exam is a professional-level certification exam for service provider professionals seeking to advance their careers. JN0-664 exam is designed to test the candidate's knowledge and skills in configuring and troubleshooting Junos-based service provider routing platforms and networks. Passing the exam validates the candidate's expertise in designing, implementing, and maintaining Juniper Networks service provider networks.

The JN0-664 exam is designed to test the candidate's knowledge and skills in a range of service provider networking technologies, including MPLS, OSPF, BGP, IS-IS, and LDP. JN0-664 Exam also covers topics such as network security, QoS, and virtualization, which are essential for service provider networks.

To be eligible for the Juniper JN0-664 certification exam, candidates must have a valid JNCIA-Junos certification or equivalent knowledge, and have at least one year of experience working with Juniper Networks service provider routing and switching technologies. Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) certification exam covers a wide range of topics, including advanced routing and switching technologies, MPLS, VPNs, QoS, and multicast protocols.

>> New JN0-664 Dumps Free <<

Reliable Juniper JN0-664 Exam Bootcamp & JN0-664 Reliable Braindumps Ppt

As we all know it is not easy and smooth for everyone to obtain the JN0-664 certification, and especially for those people who cannot make full use of their sporadic time and are not able to study in a productive way. But you are lucky, we can provide you with well-rounded services on JN0-664 practice JN0-664 test materials to help you improve ability and come over difficulties when you have trouble studying. We would be very pleased and thankful if you can spare your valuable time to have a look about features of our JN0-664 study materials.

Juniper Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) Sample Questions (Q64-Q69):

NEW QUESTION # 64
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, PE-1 and PE-2 are getting route updates for VPN-B when neither of them service that VPN Which two actions would optimize this process? (Choose two.)

  • A. Configure the resolution rib bgp.l3vpn.0 resolution-ribs inet.0 statement on the RR.
  • B. Configure the resolution rib bgp.l3vpn.0 resolution-ribs inet.0 statement on the PEs.
  • C. Configure the family route-target statement on the PEs.
  • D. Configure the family route-target statement on the RR.

Answer: A,D

Explanation:
BGP route target filtering can be configured on PE devices or on route reflectors (RRs). Configuring BGP route target filtering on RRs is more efficient and scalable, as it reduces the number of BGP sessions and updates between PE devices. To configure BGP route target filtering on RRs, the following steps are required:
Configure the family route-target statement under the BGP group or neighbor configuration on the RRs. This enables the exchange of the route-target address family between the RRs and their clients (PE devices).
Configure the resolution rib bgp.l3vpn.0 resolution-ribs inet.0 statement under the routing-options configuration on the RRs. This enables the RRs to resolve next hops for VPN routes using the inet.0 routing table.


NEW QUESTION # 65
Your network is receiving the 203.0.113.0/24 network using EBGP from AS 64500 and AS 64501. Both of these advertisements have identical local-preference values, AS-path lengths, and BGP origin codes. You want to influence the way your AS sends traffic to the 203.0.113.0/24 network.
In this scenario, which attribute would you consider next when selecting the best path?

  • A. IGP metric
  • B. router ID
  • C. MED value
  • D. peer IP address

Answer: B

Explanation:
as by default, the MED attribute is only compared for routes received from the same neighbouring AS. The next feasible tiebreaker in the BGP route selection algorithm would be Router ID.


NEW QUESTION # 66
Refer to the exhibit.

Click the Exhibit button.
After adding Customer C to your Layer 3 VPN, you must ensure that PE2 is receiving VPN routes for all customers attached to PE1, as shown in the exhibit.
Which operational command displays this information?

  • A. show route table inet.0
  • B. show route table bgp.l3vpn.0
  • C. show route table customer-c.inet.0
  • D. show route summary

Answer: B

Explanation:
Understanding the Exhibit and the Problem Statement
The diagram shows a Layer 3 VPN (L3VPN) setup where multiple customers (Customer A, B, and C) are connected across a service provider network using PE (Provider Edge) routers.
PE1 and PE2 exchange VPN routes for all customers using BGP/MPLS Layer 3 VPN (L3VPN) routing.
The question asks how to verify if PE2 is receiving VPN routes for Customer C.
Evaluating the Answer Choices
✅ B. show route table bgp.l3vpn.0 (Correct Answer)
Why?
This command shows all VPN routes stored in the BGP Layer 3 VPN table (bgp.l3vpn.0).
Since PE routers exchange VPN routes using MP-BGP, this table contains the VPN-IPv4 or VPN-IPv6 routes for all customers.
If PE2 is receiving routes from PE1 for Customer C, they will appear in bgp.l3vpn.0.
❌ A. show route table inet.0 (Incorrect)
Why?
The inet.0 table contains global unicast routes for the service provider's network.
VPN routes do not appear here because they are stored in VRF-specific tables.
This command won't help verify VPN route exchange between PE1 and PE2.
❌ C. show route table customer-c.inet.0 (Incorrect)
Why?
The table customer-c.inet.0 represents the VRF routing table for Customer C on the local PE.
It only shows locally installed routes for Customer C but does not confirm if PE2 is receiving routes from PE1.
This command is useful to check local VPN routing but not BGP route propagation.
❌ D. show route summary (Incorrect)
Why?
This command only provides a summary of route counts per protocol (BGP, OSPF, etc.).
It does not display specific VPN routes.
It is useful for general troubleshooting but doesn't confirm VPN route receipt.
Final answer: ✅ show route table bgp.l3vpn.0 (Option B)
Official Juniper Documentation Reference
Junos MPLS VPNs Configuration Guide
Juniper Documentation
"The show route table bgp.l3vpn.0 command displays all VPN-IPv4 routes learned via MP-BGP for Layer 3 VPNs."


NEW QUESTION # 67
Exhibit

You must ensure that the VPN backbone is preferred over the back door intra-area link as long as the VPN is available. Referring to the exhibit, which action will accomplish this task?

  • A. Configure the OSPF metric on the backup intra-area link that is higher than the L3VPN link.
  • B. Enable OSPF traffic-engineering.
  • C. Create an OSPF sham link between the PE routers.
  • D. Configure an import routing policy on the CE routers that rejects OSPF routes learned on the backup intra-area link.

Answer: C

Explanation:
A sham link is a logical link between two PE routers that belong to the same OSPF area but are connected through an L3VPN. A sham link makes the PE routers appear as if they are directly connected, and prevents OSPF from preferring an intra-area back door link over the VPN backbone. To create a sham link, you need to configure the local and remote addresses of the PE routers under the [edit protocols ospf area area-id] hierarchy level1.


NEW QUESTION # 68
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, which statement is true?

  • A. The 10.101.1 0/24 route will be shared if there are other VRFs that use the same route target community
  • B. The 10.101.1.0/24 route will only be shared if BGP is configured in the routing instance
  • C. The 10.101.1.0/24 route will be shared if the vrf-table-label parameter is configured.
  • D. The 10.101.1.0/24 route will be shared if the auto-export parameter is configured

Answer: D

Explanation:
The auto-export parameter is a routing option that allows a routing instance to share routes with other routing instances or the master routing table. The auto-export parameter automatically exports routes from one routing instance to another based on the route target communities attached to the routes. In this scenario, the
10.101.1.0/24 route will be shared if the auto-export parameter is configured under [edit routing-options] hierarchy level.


NEW QUESTION # 69
......

Because our Juniper JN0-664 practice test is a web-based mock test, there is no need for software installation as it works with all of the popular web browsers, including Internet Explorer, MS Edge, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, and Safari. Your preparation for the JN0-664 Certification Exam will go more smoothly because our Juniper JN0-664 online practice exam precisely replicates the environment of the actual exam.

Reliable JN0-664 Exam Bootcamp: https://www.actual4test.com/JN0-664_examcollection.html

2025 Latest Actual4test JN0-664 PDF Dumps and JN0-664 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rNY_rS1qRnpSNN1nqOG2Un8ZjVsFb6t6

Report this page